MGM Resorts International recently admitted who’s had a massive data breach which can be estimated to possess affected the data of 10.6 million customers. The admission didn’t go down well with MGM customers and now an early guest is suing the casino giant for damages.
Last week, MGM Resorts publicly acknowledged that their cloud server was hacked in 2019—hackers were found to own gained entry to a trove of data that MGM collected looking at the guests, including sensitive personal data like driver’s license and passport data, addresses, contact details, contact information, and birthdays. However, the financial information of most customers were said to own been kept safe during the attack.
Initial news regarding the leak emerged in hacking forums before MGM confirmed the same. Many notable guests have experienced their data swiped from MGM’s servers, including celebrities and CEOs.
One guest who took matters into his or her own hands is John Smallman, who filed a suit against MGM on February 21 in Nevada, accusing the corporation of failing to provide adequate protection for the info they collected from their customers. Smallman contended as part of his lawsuit the breach affected his life by compelling him to pay time and money to shield himself from possible fraud because of his information that is personal being stolen by hackers.
Smallman is represented by what the law states firm Morgan & Morgan. John Yanchunis may be the lawyer signing up for this case. He is the identical lawyer that represented several Yahoo users inside a similar data breach works.
MGM Downplays Breached Data’s Value
MGM has to date kept silent about the Smallman’s lawsuit. However, they have got turn out and claimed that the info breach affected only publicly available information. An MGM spokesman stated the hacked information was made up of data easily searchable through Internet search engines like Google, characterizing the info as “phonebook” data that could not accustomed to target victims for fraud down the road.
Smallman disagreed with MGM’s position, stating that hacking information that is personal for example license numbers, passport numbers, and military identification numbers, along with addresses and birthdays could be sufficient for criminals to generate false identities online, endangering the reputations of those they may be impersonating. In Smallman’s suit, he switches into more detail for the measures he while others like him will have to take to ensure that the hackers who possess his private information will not be able to take advantage of it to perpetuate scams.